Sample size is key. A low number of games played doesn't lead to a very accurate reading. It should be at least 100.
Also it's very likely/possible that a large number of those games were played while climbing mmr, as a result there will be a disproportionate amount of stomps since they are much better players than those around them.
Inactive players (older than 30 days) get removed from the rankings.
What DemonicTrashcan said is correct; although I feel like a more accurate representation would be 200 games minimum.
Let's just say that 1 game = 35mins (avg).
10 games = 350mins
100 games = 3500mins
That's 58 hours of gameplay (excluding queues/draft etc).
So essentially you would need ~65-75 hours to play 100 games of 1 hero.
200 games = 130-150 hours which seems reasonable (to have a good understanding of hero mechanics/items/etc).
omg!! only rank 18 sk when should be rank 10 atleast !!! e-peen not as big as it should be fix pls!!1
Like
The rankings r already broken cuz they're full of 4k's and shit
Why wud u remove ALL pros
Sometimes they shudnt be there but they r usually there if they're good at the hero, and often times have more games spread on different accounts
Pros shouldn't be removed, but pro division should be. Just go by mmr. Add higher ratings than diamond 10.
댓글을 작성하시려면 로그인이 필요합니다.
https://www.dotabuff.com/heroes/sand-king/players
This is a prime example of this.
MSS played 33 games - ranked 3rd
Maybe played 44 games - ranked 5th.
Miposhka played 33 games - ranked 14th.
This isn't fair, nor justified.